6 Saudis Detained After Pensacola Shooting, 3 Filmed Attack

Six Saudi nationals, including three who allegedly filmed Friday’s attack on Naval Air Station Pensacola, were reportedly detained after the shooting.

Breitbart News reported that a gunman opened fire at the air station Friday morning, killing three and wounding numerous others.

The Associated Press reports that the Pensacola gunman was an aviation student from Saudi Arabia, and NBC News reports that the gunman’s name was Mohammed Saeed Alshamrani.

Now the New York Times reports that six other Saudis were detained after the shooting and three of those six allegedly filmed the shooting as it unfolded in Pensacola.

The shooter was reportedly at the Pensacola to train. Former Gov. Rick Scott, currently Sen. Scott (R-FL), expressed concern that the Saudi attacker was in Pensacola training on a U.S. base:

The SITE Intelligence Group, which monitors jihadist media, identified the gunman as Mohammed al-Shamrani, saying he had posted a short manifesto on Twitter that read: “I’m against evil, and America as a whole has turned into a nation of evil.”

“I’m not against you for just being American, I don’t hate you because your freedoms, I hate you because every day you supporting, funding and committing crimes not only against Muslims but also humanity,” he wrote.

The AFP contributed to this report. 

AWR Hawkins is an award-winning Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News and the writer/curator of Down Range with AWR Hawkins, a weekly newsletter focused on all things Second Amendment, also for Breitbart News. He is the political analyst for Armed American Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at [email protected] Sign up to get Down Range at breitbart.com/downrange.

Source link

Scheer vows to never support carbon tax, blames Trudeau for national unity ‘crisis’ – National

Andrew Scheer is doubling down on his insistence that the federal Conservative party will never support a carbon tax.

The Conservative leader is proposing an amendment to the Liberals’ throne speech that would commit the government to scrapping the carbon tax.

“We’re going to fight for pipelines, lower taxes and reduced regulations to make Canada the best place in the world to invest, start a business and create jobs,” he said.

READ MORE: Climate change, healing regional divides key planks for Trudeau Liberals in Throne Speech

The amendment is unlikely to pass since all the other parties in the House of Commons support the tax and advocate bolder action to tackle climate change.

Scheer also blamed the Trudeau government for creating what he called a national unity “crisis.” with policies that he claims alienated residents in Alberta and Saskatchewan.

Story continues below advertisement

“A national unity crisis requires respecting provincial jurisdiction and scrapping the carbon tax and stopping the attack on the Western Canadian economy,” Scheer said.

“I want all our colleagues from across Canada to not underestimate the deep alienation and anger the people of my province, along with our neighbours in Alberta, currently feel about their deal in Confederation,” he said. “The damage done over the past four years is significant.”

But Scheer, who is fighting to retain his post as leader amid heavy criticism from some within his own party over his handling of the recent election campaign, appears to be comfortable isolating his party in Parliament.

He dismisses those who blame the election result on Scheer’s failure to offer a credible climate change plan, as “a chorus of voices from elite corners of Canadian high society” who want the Conservatives to endorse the idea of a carbon tax.

He says Conservatives will always oppose a carbon tax because of the real costs it imposes on Canadians.

© 2019 The Canadian Press

Source link

How Wales could swing the election – Channel 4 News

During this election I have travelled to all corners of the United Kingdom to assess the state of the Union.

We’ve reported from Scotland, England and Northern Ireland – and tonight we are in Wales, where once again we find a tapestry of old and new political issues that are defining this election – and Brexit is underpinning them all.

Source link

Joe Biden Refuses to Voluntarily Testify at Impeachment Proceedings

Joe Biden ruled out the possibility that he would voluntarily testify in the impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump on Wednesday, saying to do so would “divert” away from the issue at hand.

“No, I’m not going to let them take their eye off the ball,” the former vice president told reporters when asked about the possibility on his “No Malarkey” bus tour in Iowa. “The president is the one who has committed impeachable crimes, and I’m not going to let him divert from that. I’m not going to let anyone divert from that.”

Biden’s refusal sets up the likelihood that he would need to be subpoenaed to appear before Congress, especially if the impeachment inquiry proceeds to a trial in the Senate. Some Republicans, like Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Ron Johnson (R-WI), have already signaled it would be inappropriate for the impeachment inquiry, let alone a trial, to progress without the testimonies of both the former vice president and his youngest son, Hunter. As such, Senate Republicans have begun looking into the Obama-era White House and Hunter Biden’s wheeling and dealing in Ukraine, which has taken center stage in the inquiry.

The former vice president, for his part, has responded to calls that he and his son testify by lashing out at the Republicans, like Graham.

“Lindsey is about to go down in a way that I think he’s going to regret his whole life,” Biden said last month when asked about the senator’s efforts around impeachment. “I say Lindsey, I just—I’m just embarrassed by what you’re doing, for you. I mean, my Lord.”

Biden’s refusal to testify also underscores just how central he and his son are to the Democrats’ case for impeaching Trump. The controversy started when Trump suggested the Ukrainian government investigate how Hunter Biden was able to secure a seat on the board of directors of Burisma Holdings. The younger Biden was appointed to the Ukraine-based natural gas company’s board in 2014, despite having no background in either the energy industry or eastern Europe. More troubling was the fact that Hunter Biden’s appointment seemed to coincide with his father being tapped to lead the Obama administration’s policy towards in Ukraine in response to Russia’s invasion of Crimea.

As Peter Schweizer, senior contributor at Breitbart News, detailed in his book Secret Empires: How the American Political Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends, Hunter Biden’s background in investment banking, lobbying, and hedge fund management paled in comparison to that of current and past members of Burisma’s board.

Adding to concerns is the fact that at the time Hunter Biden joined Burisma, the company was seen as actively courting leaders in the West to prevent further scrutiny of its business practices. The same month that Hunter Biden was tapped to join the company’s board, the government of Great Britain froze accounts belonging to Burisma’s founder, Mykola Zlochevsky, under suspicion of money laundering.

A Ukrainian official with strong ties to Zlochevsky admitted in October the only reason that Hunter Biden secured the appointment was to “protect” the company from foreign scrutiny.

It is in the context of Burisma and Zlochevsky’s legal troubles that Joe Biden’s political influence has raised the most red flags. The former vice president has particularly drawn questions over his conduct in demanding the Ukrainian government fire its top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, in 2016.

Joe Biden, who has publicly bragged about the firing, reportedly threatened to withhold more than one billion dollars in U.S. aid if the Ukrainian government did not remove Shokin. He has claimed the demand came from then-President Barack Obama, who had allegedly lost faith in the prosecutor’s ability to tackle corruption.

Unofficially, though, it was known that Shokin was investigating both Burisma and Zlochevsky for public corruption. It is uncertain if the probe extended to Hunter Biden, although Shokin has recently admitted that prior to his ouster, he was warned to back off the matter. Regardless of what occurred, Shokin’s successor, who is now himself being investigated for public corruption, dropped the investigation into Burisma.

Congressional Republicans have cited the shadowy timeline of events and the appearance of conflicting interests when arguing for Hunter and Joe Biden to testify before the impeachment proceedings.

“I believe that Hunter Biden’s association on that board doesn’t pass the smell test,” Graham told reporters last month. “If a Republican was in the same boat they would be eaten alive by the media.”

Source link

Bring All Foreigners to U.S. Who Promise to Create Jobs

Billionaire Michael Bloomberg, now running in the 2020 Democrat presidential primary, has said the United States should import every foreign national “from around this world” who promise to create jobs.

During a 2010 interview with ABC News, Bloomberg said if he were president, his only requirement for a foreign national to secure a Green Card would be if they promise to create ten or more U.S. jobs, regardless of the impact that such legal immigration has on America’s working and middle class.

“If I were the president, working with Congress, I would give a Green Card to anybody from around this world who wants to come here and create a business,” Bloomberg said. “They keep the Green Card, let’s say, ten or more workers.”

Such a plan could potentially import tens of millions of legal immigrants every year to the U.S. — a level of legal immigration that the nation has never experienced.

Bloomberg also falsely claimed in the interview that there “are no statistics” to support the belief that illegal aliens take jobs away from America’s working class.

“There’s a widely held belief, perhaps you think it’s wrong, by many Americans that people who are here illegally are taking jobs that American citizens could take,” the ABC News interviewer told Bloomberg.

Bloomberg responded:

There is that belief. There are no statistics to back it up and I can tell you we have, we estimate, roughly 500,000 undocumented illegals in this city and basically they come here to work, they have very low crime, they don’t use our schools because they are young and they tend not to bring their families and they don’t go to hospitals. You don’t need hospital care when you are young.

Research not only finds that mass immigration encourages job discrimination against Americans, but it also keeps wages low for big business executives to cut labor costs and increase their profit margins.

Already in the last decade, the U.S. brought nearly 11 million legal immigrants to the country — a population larger than New York City — who almost immediately begin competing against America’s working and middle class for jobs. Of those nearly 11 million who arrived since 2008, nearly eight million came to the U.S. for no other reason than to reunite with foreign relatives already in the country.

Currently, the nation’s Washington, DC-imposed mass legal immigration policy — where about 1.5 million unskilled legal immigrants are admitted to the U.S. every year — is a boon to corporate executives, Wall Street, big business, and multinational conglomerates, as America’s working and middle class have their wealth redistributed to the country’s top earners through wage stagnation.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.

Source link

Azerbaijan’s 2020 state budget approved at last reading in parliament

BAKU, Azerbaijan, Nov. 29

By Elchin Mehdiyev – Trend:

The bill “On state budget of the Republic of Azerbaijan for 2020” was put forward for discussion during the third reading at the plenary session in the Azerbaijani parliament on Nov. 29.

The 2020 state budget was approved at the last reading in the parliament.

story will be updated

Follow Trend on Telegram. Only most interesting and important news

Source link

The Channel 4 News Climate Debate – Channel 4 News

Channel 4 News hosts the first ever leaders’ debate on the climate crisis.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, Scotland’s First Minister and SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon, Lib Dem leader Jo Swinson, the Green Party’s co-leader Sian Berry and Plaid Cymru leader Adam Price will all be in the studio. Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage did not accept our invitation to attend.

For many voters, the climate crisis is a key issue in this year’s election: the five warmest years on record all took place in the last decade and with the UK currently set to miss its emissions targets in the 2020s and 2030s, many of the parties have made their green policies front and centre.

Source link

Furious China Denounces U.S. Bills in Support of Hong Kong Protesters

President Donald Trump’s signing of bills on Hong Kong human rights drew a furious reaction from China’s Communist regime on Thursday, with the U.S. ambassador in Beijing summoned to face a warning the move has been denounced by “all Chinese people” and the U.S. should ready for a “stern” response.

Trump signed the bills, which were approved by near unanimous consent in the House and Senate, in a show of support for Hong Kong’s pro-democracy demonstrators, as Breitbart News reported.

“I signed these bills out of respect for President Xi, China, and the people of Hong Kong,” Trump said in a statement. “They are being enacted in the hope that Leaders and Representatives of China and Hong Kong will be able to amicably settle their differences leading to long term peace and prosperity for all.”

The law, which confirms the U.S. backing pro-democracy demonstrators in Hong Kong, further escalates tensions between Beijing and the U.S. and elicited a spirited denunciation from China.

“This is a pure interference in China’s internal affairs,” China’s ministry of foreign affairs said on Thursday, hours after the bill was passed into law. “This bill, which has been denounced by all Chinese people, including Hong Kong compatriots, is full of prejudice and arrogance. It treats Hong Kong with intimidation and threats.

“Such an act will make Chinese people, including Hong Kong compatriots, understand the sinister intentions and hegemonic nature of the U.S.,” the ministry added in comments repeated across Chinese state media. “The U.S. plot is doomed to fail.”

Kurt Zindulka

Beijing summoned U.S. ambassador Terry Branstad for the second time in a week to demand Washington stop interfering in China’s internal affairs. China also promised it would retaliate with “firm countermeasures”

Asked what those countermeasures would be, Geng Shuang, spokesman for the ministry simply said: “What is due to come will eventually come.”

Trump also signed a second bill passed by Congress, banning the export to the Hong Kong police of crowd-control munitions, such as teargas, pepper spray, rubber bullets and stun guns.

“I signed these bills out of respect for president Xi, China, and the people of Hong Kong. They are being enacted in the hope that leaders and representatives of China and Hong Kong will be able to amicably settle their differences leading to long term peace and prosperity for all,” Trump confirmed a statement on Wednesday.

The Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019 allows the United States to level sanctions on individuals who carry out human rights violations in Hong Kong, which has been rocked by mass protests for more than five months.

The legislation also requires the State Department’s annual certification to Congress that Hong Kong is “upholding the rule of law and protecting rights” before continuing the city’s special relationship with the U.S.

Hong Kong, a former British colony that was granted special autonomy when China took control in 1997, has been rocked by six months of sometimes violent pro-democracy demonstrations, as Breitbart News has reported extensively from the outset.

AP and AFP contributed to this report

Follow Simon Kent on Twitter: or e-mail to: [email protected]

Source link

Experts discussed the challenges of modern media in Prague

At the end of November, the II Media Forum: freedom of journalism in the context of human rights, new technologies and information security was held in Prague. The three-day event was attended by more than 100 journalists, experts, political scientists from 24 countries, representing various regions of the world. The aim of the forum was to find common approaches, to bring together the positions of the expert community on a number of pressing issues in the field of modern media.

The forum was organized by the Russian journal International Affairs, the independent European platform Modern Diplomacy, as well as the Bulgarian journal International Relations.

The challenges facing modern journalism are not highly specialized. The modern world has entered a new era of ideological multipolarity, the context of which cannot be left out of the brackets when discussing modern media, freedom and human rights. Illusions ended in the same time with the end of “unipolarity”. Among them: blind faith in democracy and liberalism. Francis Fukuyama, the author of the concept of the “end of history,” admitted this: “What I said back then [in 1992] is that one of the problems with modern democracy is that it provides peace and prosperity but people want more than that… liberal democracies don’t even try to define what a good life is, it’s left up to individuals, who feel alienated, without purpose, and that’s why joining these identity groups gives them some sense of community.”

Speakers and participants in the session “Modern Journalism in the New Ideological Multipolarity” spoke out differently. The report of the famous philosopher A. Shchipkov says that the ability to control social processes within the framework of the previous system is becoming weaker, the accumulation of internal contradictions in this system is becoming more obvious, and most importantly, the author claims that a change in the modernist paradigm in the very near future is inevitable. “The current social and economic state of society is defined as the state of post-capitalism. Its peculiarity lies in the fact that the usual financial, economic and cultural instruments for managing society cease to work. In order to maintain social order and stability, the world’s political centers of power have to use increasingly harsh forms of military coercion, artificially create crises, conflicts and lines of tension around the world. But this path can only stabilize the situation for a short time. The next step in the radicalization and at the same time archaization of the neoliberal social and political regime was the transition to new totalitarian social and political concepts, such as “conflict of civilizations”, “risk society” and “digital society”, A. Shchipkov believes.

Director of the Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences Alexei Gromyko noted: “Today we are witnessing the decline of the West-centered world, with which their version of liberalism and the era of the unipolar world are collapsing.” But there were those among the speakers who believed that liberalism, despite the intensification of the processes of globalization, would nevertheless remain the main ideological and economic model throughout the world.

Meilinne DeLara, the head of the Benelux diplomatic council, in her speech at the Forum elaborated on the topic of the existence of modern society in the world of post-truth. According to her, political fraud is based on technological processes and business models: “The very essence of a democratic idea is distorted. Post-truth is an emotional argument that serves to create public opinion, ”says Meilinn DeLara.

The Chief Editor of the Bulgarian journal International Relations in his speech also emphasized that the era of globalization is over. In this connection, states will need to revise their economic and social policies in order to preserve themselves.

During the sessions “The modern world and the responsibility of journalism” and “Journalism of the post-information era, or the “age of misinformation ” journalists, experts discussed the main problems that journalism faces today. New media and traditional media, the blogosphere and social networks, fakes and deep fakes, the dominance of the post-modern model of modern culture and its influence on the media, the dormancy of the secondary reality of the media, the destruction of memory institutions (rewriting history) – all of these became the subject of professional discussion of the participants.

The famous Italian journalist, Director of the Pandora TV channel, Julietto Chiesa, noted that the information field is practically under the control of mainstream media that reflect only the official news agenda, as well as corporations that primarily pursue their commercial interests.

Chinese journalist Tom Wang, Editor of the online platform GlokalHK, emphasizes the importance of finding the media its “place” in a changing world: “As the new media world moves towards the dominance of algorithms, fake news reports, “echo cameras” on social networks, for media with ethics and standards, it is increasingly important to find a viable business model in this new landscape. ”

On the third day of the Forum, ICT experts met at the session: “Information and communication technologies in the context of the media.”

It should be noted that ICT, being in conditions of total breakdown of the world order, are very vulnerable: technologies are influenced and have an impact, information takes on new forms that have a significant impact on a person, his consciousness, society and states. Experts from different countries (Czech Republic, Russia, India, Switzerland, Bulgaria, etc.) expressed concern that the issues of cybersecurity and the consequences of the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) in various fields, including the media, are not discussed in the international community with due seriousness and attention, which is a great threat to all of humanity. The theses voiced at the conference that “international law is not adapted to the challenges in the cyber sphere” are a call for interaction, cooperation and the development of common approaches in the field of ICT in order to maintain the security of the world.

More information about the Forum on the site: freemediaforum.info


Facebook comments

Tags: eu, European Union, featured, freedom of journalism, full-image, II Media Forum, politics

Category: A Frontpage, Czech Republic, Human Rights, World

Source link